Plos One Submission

Number each item so that your points are easy to follow (this will also make it easier for the authors to respond to each. In 2014, publication output in PLOS ONE dropped by 12%, from 3019 published papers in January to 2657 in February. Dear JRRD Readership,. However, formatting rules can vary widely between applications and fields of interest or study. The research is important for us to better understand users' behaviors, which could help to provide better. Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science. org/licenses/by-nc/4. PLOS Biology. In 2017, PLOS Genetics joined the initiative, as detailed in a blog post. Part of the reduced output. The site will be going under maintenance mode from 02:30 EST to 05:00 EST. Indeed, it is the largest journal the world has ever seen. uk) now, citing your manuscript tracking number. USA and UK. Submission. PLOS ONE accepts scientifically rigorous research, regardless of perceived impact. Human trafficking involves the use of force, fraud, or coercion to obtain some type of labor or commercial sex act. Tackling winter blues. The journal also provides high-quality reviews and perspectives written by respected leaders in the. Submission Step One: Starting the Submission Step 1 ensures that the Author understands the journal's submission rules. They found very inadequate reproducibility and transparency standards around the board. All journals are peer reviewed, featuring quality research, expert commentary and critical analysis. The second task is to distinguish quality within real journals. Open access journals, like PLoS and BMC journals, make you pay only once when they accept an article. Articles in this Collection will be specially selected by a panel of Guest Editors and will include research on translational and clinically relevant areas, including. The content report is generated via PubMed and PLOS search. Reviews for "PLoS ONE" We decided to submit to PLoS ONE because we wanted to make our research and especially the underlying data and codes open access. Before writing your article, please email [email protected] PLoS ONE, the academic publishing giant which was founded in December 2006, publishs more than ten thousands artices each year since 2011, and the number is still increasing dramatically. Because of dogs’ prolonged evolution with humans, many of the canine cognitive skills are thought to represent a selection of traits that make dogs particularly sensitive to human cues. PLOS Biology. Here is our featured author question for July. Available from www. The open-access mega-journal's output, measured by how many articles it publishes a year, last year fell to 22,054 -- its lowest since 2012 and down about 30 percent since its peak in 2013. That title is now held by Scientific Reports (Springer Nature), which published a total of 6,214 research articles in the first quarter of 2017, compared to 5,541 articles in PLOS ONE. After acceptance, we provide support so your article gains maximum impact in the scientific community and beyond. Almost rejected. PLoS ONE entered the market claiming fast publication times, but data show that PLoS ONE is slowing down, with times more than doubling over the past few years. Publishers, authors or their designee deposit files and the NIHMS converts them to the PMC native format. How Nationals stayed in fight to capture World Series title. Access to society journal content varies across our titles. It will short circuit the gradual progress they have made in persuading regular, non-waccaloon science folks of the PLoS ONE mission. Submit Manuscript Publications Blog For Reviewers For Authors About. That is, they can invite someone who is not on the editor list to temporarily edit a paper. The PLOS Reviewer Center provides everything you need get started as a peer reviewer including best practice resources, a peer review template, video, and more!. Editorial and Publishing Policies All PLOS journals share a core set of Editorial and Publishing Policies outlined below. The new version will use the same doi as the original submission, which also will remain accessible on the bioRxiv site. Academic Journals. Microcaecilia dermatophaga. PLOS ONE What papers are received?I see an article with a differential evolution algorithm and no biological problems, can I? the submission was rejected for one. Impact Factor of Plos Biology, 1545-7885, Journal Impact Factor report. selectd rejected, modified Plos one, first trial for more than one month, two reviewers, edited toOverhaul, more opinions, wrote more than 20 pages, after uploading with the editor more than 20 days directly accepted. The invoiced APC is the one valid at the time of manuscript submission. PLOS ONE is playing a very large numbers game, so a sizable decline in published papers signals a structural shift and not a random blip. These templates typically mimic the layout of the articles published by the journal and allow the author to preview their written work in this final layout. Mining user opinion from Micro-Blogging has been extensively studied on the most popular social networking sites such as Twitter and Facebook in the U. We offer $75 for digital reprint rights for cover art. Many academic journals provide LaTeX templates for authors to submit articles (also known as publications or papers) for review. We added ORCID sign-in in 2014, and in 2016 became one of the first publishers to sign the open letter committing to implement ORCID according to their best practices for publishers across our entire. Submit your next article to PLOS ONE and find out why more than two-thirds of authors rate their publishing experience with PLOS ONE as better than any other. To make it as easy as possible for our communities, we have all of our PLOS ONE submission instructions posted online. PLos one's review speed is still very fast, the first trial is almost one and a half months, two reviewers, one medium repair, one minor repair, no need to supplement the experiment. Teams who decide to submit a shorter iGEM Report will have their work posted immediately to PLOS Collections. Investigation Using Tencent Micro-Blogging”. However, formatting rules can vary widely between applications and fields of interest or study. Submit Site Search. If you choose to post your manuscript to bioRxiv, select the article category and subject. post-7499352509460596990 2017-07-27T14:06:00. This 2017 isolate had accumulated one single nucleotide polymorphism compared with a 2007 deer isolate , suggesting that the patient was exposed to a circulating strain of M. The application must be submitted for a standard due date under an FOA (Funding Opportunity Announcement) that uses Standard Due Dates for that council round. Both datasets contain many more images of men than women, and the objects and activities depicted with different genders show what the researchers call “significant” gender. As reported earlier this year, the open access mega-journal has experienced two successive declines in article output, from a peak of. PLOS Medicine. BibTeX @MISC{Diesing_vulnerabilityof, author = {Anne-kathrin Diesing and Constanze Nossol and Sven Dänicke and Nicole Walk and Andreas Post and Stefan Kahlert and Hermann-josef Rothkötter}, title = {Vulnerability of polarised intestinal porcine epithelial cells to mycotoxin deoxynivalenol depends on the route of application. As a result, the submission was given 5 days later, the editor was invited for 18 days, and then with the editor is still 9 days!This rhythm is also called fast!!?I haven’t sent an external trial until now, is this speed??If the external trial has. Publishers, authors or their designee deposit files and the NIHMS converts them to the PMC native format. To have your reference list or bibliography automatically made for you, try our free citation generator. Many indices have been developed to try to distinguish good journals from bad. Note: the citation style and format (paragraph spacing, line numbers, etc. Public Library of Science. (4) Since this was a largely positive experience, why not submit every paper to PLoS ONE? I very much enjoyed my first experience publishing at PLoS ONE. Statue Menhir de Plos 1,76 x 1,05 x 0,36 mServait de passerelle PDF document - DocSlides- 2 3 5 6 8 9 4 7 14 13 11 10 12 15 16 Syndicat d’Initiative81320 Murat sur. Here's one way to read the manuscript that involves going a bit out of order: Read the abstract and introduction to get a sense of the overall context and approach (if the abstract and introduction do not do a good job summarizing the findings, you might need to read further to get this information). Infomercial in PLOS One links to website selling unproven treatments for fibromyalgia and dementia. PLoS ONE entered the market claiming fast publication times, but data show that PLoS ONE is slowing down, with times more than doubling over the past few years. BMC said that language can be accepted. PLOS accelerates progress in science and medicine by leading a transformation in research communication. In 2017, PLOS Genetics joined the initiative, as detailed in a blog post. Submit Manuscript Publications Blog For Reviewers For Authors About. Editorial and Publishing Policies All PLOS journals share a core set of Editorial and Publishing Policies outlined below. As reported earlier this year, the open access mega-journal has experienced two successive declines in article output, from a peak of. One assumes that these systems, like most other commonly-used software, have accumulated a great deal of cruft over the years. I resolutely gave up other TOP journals and chose to submit plos one, just to make it faster. Jana Pawła II powstała jako jeden z owoców I Wrocławskiego Kongresu Nowej Ewangelizacji. org If this author will not be available for an extended period of time, email PLOS ONE. Researcher Academy; Author Services; Try out personalized alert features. I really don't see any compelling reason why I would choose to send a paper to Scientific Reports over PLoS ONE. Version of Record. Seong J, Chung EJ, Kim H, Kim GE, Kim NK, Sohn SK, Min JS, Suh CO: Assessment of biomarkers in paired primary and recurrent colorectal adenocarcinomas. PHYSICAL SCIENCE EXPANSION Find a home for your Physical Sciences and Engineering research in PLOS ONE. PLoS ONE features reports of primary research from all disciplines within science and medicine. academic-bookshop. Academic Journals. If you want to publish something quickly, Plos One is the wrong choice! Indeed, it is the slowest among all the journals I have submitted to. Submission instructions for PLOS Biology are posted here and questions can be directed to [email protected] And as PLoS Biology has thrived, it has become the central icon of PLoS and OA, lending its prestige to PLoS's other ventures, including community-run journals and now PLoS ONE. Mining user opinion from Micro-Blogging has been extensively studied on the most popular social networking sites such as Twitter and Facebook in the U. Include your responses to all the reviewers' and editors' comments and list the changes you have made to the. Introduction Very few studies have explored the associations between self-identified sexual orientation and comprehensive vaccination coverage. Summaries of the latest science useful in life. This Authorea document template can be used to prepare documents according to the citation style and authoring guidelines of PLOS ONE. This all worked very well and I helped a range of papers of varying quality and importance get published in that time period – crucially all of them meeting the publication criteria. Any user can nominate content for the Channel by email or via social media. The PLOS Reviewer Center provides everything you need get started as a peer reviewer including best practice resources, a peer review template, video, and more!. PLoS ONE is run as a partnership between its in-house PLoS staff and international Advisory and Editorial Boards, ensuring fast, fair, and professional peer review. The Official PLOS Blog. Within each section, you can talk about the biggest issues first or go systematically figure-by-figure or claim-by-claim. Authors of most PLOS journals can now opt to post their manuscript as a preprint upon submission. Information about the open-access journal PLoS ONE in DOAJ. Please note that manuscript can only be submitted by an author of the manuscript and may not be submitted by a third party. The scope was further expanded by the participation of PLOS ONE in 2018. I object to this use of the scientific literature to market such a device. Submit Manuscript Publications Blog For Reviewers For Authors About. Sign in to PLOS. PLOS encourages authors to post preprints as a way to accelerate the dissemination of research. In the study, published in the journal PLoS ONE on Thursday, scientists from British Antarctic Survey and four Chilean research institutes detail their development of a new technique for analyzing. Keyword Research: People who searched plos one submission also searched. The first task is to distinguish predatory journals from real journals. This pre-publication peer review will concentrate on technical rather than subjective concerns and may involve discussion with other members of the Editorial Board and/or the solicitation of formal reports from independent referees. Microcaecilia dermatophaga. Reviews for "PLoS ONE" We decided to submit to PLoS ONE because we wanted to make our research and especially the underlying data and codes open access. However, formatting rules can vary widely between applications and fields of interest or study. How do you get started as a new peer reviewer? Follow these 10 quick tips to jump-start your reviewing career. 411 for 2010) indicates the reach of paleontology papers in that journal. Create a PLOS ONE account – so you can be ready to respond to user comments Before your paper is published, please also create an account on the PLOS ONE journal publication site, if you have not yet done so; this is independent of the manuscript submission and peer review system. Investigation Using Tencent Micro-Blogging”. In the end, we decided to submit to PLoS ONE (without me having to twist the arms of coauthors at all!), because I thought the paper would be seen by the widest viewership and might get more reads by ecologists in general (as opposed to just plant ecologists, or just savanna ecologists). All authors can provide a DOI for previously posted preprints at the repository of their choice. There are no restrictions on. Part of the reduced output. We'll be right back! We're performing scheduled maintenance on our websites, please check back soon!. Submission Process: Publisher posts the paper directly to PMC Papers are required to be submitted via the NIHMS upon acceptance for publication. post-7499352509460596990 2017-07-27T14:06:00. PLOS (Public Library of Science) is a nonprofit publisher and advocacy organization with a mission to accelerate progress in science and medicine by leading a transformation in research communication. You like to find,And I like to hide. At the same. PLOS publishes a suite of Open Access journals across all areas of science and medicine: PLOS ONE, PLOS Biology, PLOS Medicine, PLOS Computational Biology, PLOS Genetics, PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases and PLOS Pathogens. The New England Journal of Medicine The most trusted, influential source of new medical. 121 122 123 2 Methods 124 125 2. Michael Kraus (social psychology of social class) blogged about his experience publishing a paper in PLoS ONE. 出版數量: 12 期 / 一年。 每年出版論文的數量: 一年約出版 15800. By featuring such work in full open access, the journal seeks to raise broad awareness and accelerate progress in these areas. "PLoS ONE forms a home for any article; it no longer has to have a journal of its own. If you would like to submit your work to PLOS ONE we can transfer your files directly into PLOS ONE's manuscript handling system; please contact the PLOS ONE publication staff ([email protected] We measured vessel density (VD) according to analysis area and foveal avascular zone (FAZ) si. ” Aggregation of macroparasites on hosts is frequently observed but poorly understood. The specialist journals in my field top out with impact factors of about 3. The PLOS Reviewer Center provides everything you need get started as a peer reviewer including best practice resources, a peer review template, video, and more!. The WASC Senior College and University Commission (”the Commission”) is a regional accrediting agency serving a diverse membership of public and private higher education institutions throughout California, Hawaii, and the Pacific as well as a limited number of institutions outside the U. As a result, the submission was given 5 days later, the editor was invited for 18 days, and then with the editor is still 9 days!This rhythm is also called fast!!?I haven’t sent an external trial until now, is this speed??If the external trial has. Forgot your password? We will send you an email with a link to reset your password. Anyone can think of the dataOk, I am one of them. com Plos One Instructions Authors Figures PLOS ONE promises fair, rigorous peer review, broad scope, and wide These are step-by-step instructions for submitting a manuscript to our online submission system. If you have the ability, you can submit in a professional journal. Since impact is such an important factor for a considerable number of authors publishing in PLOS ONE, a decline in impact could conceivably impact on submissions particularly if authors feel there is a likelihood of continued decline. Biggles PLOS one submission data. I feel that after the revision in 2015, from the format to the review, the whole is strict, the reviewers are very professional. Besides, PLOS provides a level of scientific reviewing that leads to excellent research open to all, which I think will be fundamental to influence public policy for proper conservation actions. This makes the publisher highly vulnerable to market changes and competition with larger, more. The study was published online on July 24 in PLOS Biology. By featuring such work in full open access, the journal seeks to raise broad awareness and accelerate progress in these areas. This finding rests on a large (178,000) and reliable sample; the journals polled are broadly recognized (Nature, Cell, PLOS ONE and Physica A). Añel, Attached our work to submit to PLoS ONE. MediLexicon. PLos one's review speed is still very fast, the first trial is almost one and a half months, two reviewers, one medium repair, one minor repair, no need to supplement the experiment. Countdown to REF submission deadline begins Published: 1 October 2019 The REF team has launched a pilot of the software for collecting REF submission data, marking a major milestone on the road towards the submission deadline in November next year. Most of the previous studies that reported health disparities among lesbian, gay and bisexual populations were not based on a nationally representative sample of U. PLOS encourages authors to post preprints as a way to accelerate the dissemination of research. Jana Pawła II powstała jako jeden z owoców I Wrocławskiego Kongresu Nowej Ewangelizacji. “With this single-click technology in place, those wishing to submit their work to PLOS will be able to do so quickly; an efficient and convenient submission process is one of our top priorities. PLOS is not a financially diversified company. Preferred formats for PLoS ONE are:. It’s helpful to divide this section into two parts: one for major issues and one for minor issues. Founded with the aim of accelerating the pace of scientific advancement and demonstrating its value, we believe all rigorous science needs to be published and discoverable, widely disseminated and freely accessible to all. This video shows PLOS ONE authors how to use PACE, the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine, to check figure files for adherence to PLOS publishing requirements. PLOS Biology. Direct Observation of Single Amyloid-beta (1-40) Oligomers on Live Cells: Binding and Growth at Physiological Concentrations. Authors of manuscripts in the life sciences can take advantage of our partnership with bioRxiv to post a preprint as part of the PLOS submission process. Art Submission Guidelines. Cover letter Upload a cover letter as a separate file in the online system. Jen is the Editorial Media Manager for PLOS. Number each item so that your points are easy to follow (this will also make it easier for the authors to respond to each. Zanetti-Domingues. bovis at some point through his hunting activities and had reactivation of infection as pulmonary disease in 2017. Show Review in Original Language. PLOS (Public Library of Science) is a nonprofit publisher and advocacy organization with a mission to accelerate progress in science and medicine by leading a transformation in research communication. We are currently closed to art submissions. Google Sites 1 https://sites. External link. Anyone can think of the dataOk, I am one of them. Investigation Using Tencent Micro-Blogging”. The Journal provides a platform for securing visual images concerning medical cases that the physicians come across in all medical subspecialties for better understanding of. So it would seem to make sense to start from scratch and build a new, modern manuscript submission system from the ground up. Submission of a manuscript to PLOS Currents: Outbreaks implies that all listed authors contributed substantially to the work, and that the work is an original contribution. If related manuscripts are submitted to PLOS ONE, the authors may be advised to combine them into a single manuscript at the editor's discretion. I have submitted papers to both PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports. Tuberculosis AMA PLOS Science Wednesday: Hi Reddit, we’re Dr. ) Implicit in the guidelines for writing Ten. Michael Kraus (social psychology of social class) blogged about his experience publishing a paper in PLoS ONE. If you have access to a journal via a society or association membership, please browse to your society journal, select an article to view, and follow the instructions in this box. 119 work, one should be very cautious when using DUD-E for machine learning based 120 methodology development. By featuring such work in full open access, the journal seeks to raise broad awareness and accelerate progress in these areas. Re: public opinion on gun control. It is truly one of the worst acupuncture meta-analyses that I’ve ever seen and reveals a real problem with peer review at PLOS ONE. ===update=== Just got the first decision a few days ago. org If this author will not be available for an extended period of time, email PLOS ONE. A biomaterial is now defined as a substance. The world's largest Open Access Journal, PLoS ONE, has teamed up with one of the fastest growing multidisciplinary medical associations, SBMT, in order to better educate physicians, scientists. Eine wesentliche Besonderheit ist, dass die Zeitschrift alle Wissenschaftsbereiche abdecken möchte. Art Submission Guidelines. However, the review comments of BMC are all major comments. Implementation Science is a pioneering, highly-accessed journal dedicated to publishing evidence regarding methods for promoting the uptake of consolidated. PLOS ONE accepts scientifically rigorous research, regardless of perceived impact. Both datasets contain many more images of men than women, and the objects and activities depicted with different genders show what the researchers call “significant” gender. We are currently closed to art submissions. There are not many. The concept of publishing without having to battle the system was the big driver behind the explosive growth of PLoS ONE. Statue Menhir de Plos 1,76 x 1,05 x 0,36 mServait de passerelle PDF document - DocSlides- 2 3 5 6 8 9 4 7 14 13 11 10 12 15 16 Syndicat d’Initiative81320 Murat sur. Anyone can think of the dataOk, I am one of them. 46:850-857(2014). Atherosclerosis has an open access mirror journal Atherosclerosis: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The relationship between a low grain intake dietary pattern and impulsive behaviors in middle-aged Japanese people. PLOS offsets publication expenses - including those of peer review management, journal production and online hosting and archiving - by charging an Article Processing Charge (APC), to authors, institutions or funders for each. Reports of well-performed scientific studies from all disciplines freely available to the whole world. PLOS believes that lack of funds should not be a barrier to Open Access publication. At the same. We recently published a study titled Longitudinal influence of alcohol and marijuana use on academic performance in college students in PLOS ONE. Before writing your article, please email [email protected] Submission Process: Publisher posts the paper directly to PMC Papers are required to be submitted via the NIHMS upon acceptance for publication. If there are any details you can't find, please email us at [email protected] But I have some concerns about PLOS's new open data policy. As a new user, click "Register Now" to create an account. Taken together, these observations directly demonstrate that LPS can be bound to LDL and cleared from the circulation by hepatocytes via the LDLR. We like science to be out in the open, and publication of peer-reviewed research to take place without undue delays, so that others can use and build upon the findings. Page Range Example from PLoS ONE. Impact Factor of Plos Genetics, 1553-7404, Journal Impact Factor report. PLOS ONE: accelerating the publication of peer-reviewed Journals. Direct Observation of Single Amyloid-beta (1-40) Oligomers on Live Cells: Binding and Growth at Physiological Concentrations. Authors of manuscripts in the life sciences can take advantage of our partnership with bioRxiv to post a preprint as part of the PLOS submission process. There is a growing appreciation of the importance of data storage, maintenance and sharing among the scientific research community. PLOS Medicine. We first offered authors the option to enter ORCID iDs in the Editorial Manager submission system in 2013. PeerJ:Next PLoS ONE? Homepage research publication eco-links join the lab. org to discuss the topic's suitability with the journal's editors. Get this from a library! PLoS one. Image via PLOS ONE/Wu et. The trust of the PLoS brand also helped, says Patterson. As a result, the submission was given 5 days later, the editor was invited for 18 days, and then with the editor is still 9 days!This rhythm is also called fast!!?I haven't sent an external trial until now, is this speed??If the external trial has. PLoS ONE Time to Publication. The paper, “Can Observation Skills of Citizen Scientists Be Estimated Using Species Accumulation Curves”, is published in PLoS ONE and available to everyone (Kelling et al. PLOS ONE: an inclusive, peer-reviewed, open-access resource from the PUBLIC LIBRARY OF SCIENCE. Submit Manuscript Publications Blog For Reviewers For Authors About. Each author should have made real and concrete contributions. PLOS ONE is playing a very large numbers game, so a sizable decline in published papers signals a structural shift and not a random blip. Editor PLoS ONE 23 Dear Dr. This Authorea document template can be used to prepare documents according to the citation style and authoring guidelines of PLOS ONE. Specifically, he criticised open access journals such as PLoS ONE both for their lack of sub-editorial services and for creating a home for poor quality science. Substance use and misuse affect people worldwide, of all ages and from all walks of life, resulting in a substantial burden of ill health and mortality, and presenting big challenges in prevention and treatment. Reports of well-performed scientific studies from all disciplines freely available to the whole world. An analysis of article-level metrics of 27,856 PLOS ONE articles reveals that the number of tweets was weakly associated with the number of citations (beta = 0. CEW larvae feed on silks, kernels and cobs, causing substantial yield and quality losses both through herbivory and by vectoring pathogens. Include your responses to all the reviewers' and editors' comments and list the changes you have made to the. The study was published online on July 24 in PLOS Biology. Read a recent update to this piece: PLOS ONE Output Drops Again In 2016. Become a contributor and guest post AMP stories to 65 websites. Style The style of Speaking of Medicine is not formal academia. For this, they provide a template which contains the structure and reference style they would like for submissions. There are nearly 200 species of caecilians, but most people will never encounter one. Increasingly, government bodies, funding agencies, and journals are making data retention and availability part of their requirements for grants and publications-and reviewers are often asked to evaluate author-supplied datasets as part of peer review. We are able to confirm mobility patterns of individuals previously measured from the mobile phones, with the. Introduction Very few studies have explored the associations between self-identified sexual orientation and comprehensive vaccination coverage. This free service is available to anyone who has published and whose publication is in Scopus. Image via PLOS ONE/Wu et. From the selected journal's website, follow Publish → Submissions → Submit Now to be directed to the online submission system for that particular PLOS journal. Manuscript 30 Peer Review Procedures Overview: All manuscripts submitted to PLOS ONE are subject to rigorous review. (4) Since this was a largely positive experience, why not submit every paper to PLoS ONE? I very much enjoyed my first experience publishing at PLoS ONE. Human trafficking involves the use of force, fraud, or coercion to obtain some type of labor or commercial sex act. PLoS ONE entered the market claiming fast publication times, but data show that PLoS ONE is slowing down, with times more than doubling over the past few years. Whether you're new to reviewing, facing a tricky situation, or just looking to brush up on your skills, you'll find the guidance that you need here. Many indices have been developed to try to distinguish good journals from bad. Founded with the aim of accelerating the pace of scientific advancement and demonstrating its value, we believe all rigorous science needs to be published and discoverable, widely disseminated and freely accessible to all. The trust of the PLoS brand also helped, says Patterson. Fundacja Vide et Crede im. For your submission, insert the table as you would for any smaller table. Read the current issue of The Lancet Global Health, a monthly open access journal publishing robustly designed original research on all aspects of global health. Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube. A biomaterial is now defined as a substance. PLoS One Manuscript Submission. If related manuscripts are submitted to PLOS ONE, the authors may be advised to combine them into a single manuscript at the editor's discretion. However, after the final revision, it was closed. All enquiries can be addressed to [email protected] The research is important for us to better understand users' behaviors, which could help to provide better. plos oneの,ひいてはplosの目指した理念を受け入れる人々が増えているのか,それとも結局は人々はifにひかれただけなのか。plos oneの真価が問われるのはこれからである。. Workflow and general overview. Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery. If there are any details you can’t find, please email us at [email protected] but you're not sure to which journal you should submit it? Or maybe you want to find relevant articles to cite in your paper? Or. The scope was further expanded by the participation of PLOS ONE in 2018. PLOS believes that lack of funds should not be a barrier to Open Access publication. Summaries of the latest science useful in life. Updated June 2013 - Many of you reach this page searching for the impact factor of Scientific Reports. 2017;12(7):e0181057 DOI 10. Plos One Instructions Authors Figures PLOS ONE promises fair, rigorous peer review, broad scope, and wide These are step-by-step instructions for submitting a manuscript to our online submission system. (optional) こちらも、任意回答。もしこの論文が受理されたら、PLOS ONE. Read the current issue of The Lancet Global Health, a monthly open access journal publishing robustly designed original research on all aspects of global health. PLoS ONE 2018;13: e0201497) Influenza and other respiratory infections are not well-studied in low and middle-income countries. Each submission to PLOS ONE must be written as an independent unit and should not rely on any work that has not already been accepted for publication. Depends on who you ask, and what you consider "good. The threads at SV-POW! are hopping right now, particularly with one commenting on open access in Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. No wonder I can get 1280 knives. The content report is generated via PubMed and PLOS search. Submission. The reviews for Casper's second PLoS ONE submission, submitted around May 25th are in. selectd rejected, modified Plos one, first trial for more than one month, two reviewers, edited toOverhaul, more opinions, wrote more than 20 pages, after uploading with the editor more than 20 days directly accepted. Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery. Aligned with our founding mission, we aim to be as fast as. Publication Fees. After much consideration and a full review of the platform, we have made the difficult decision to cease publication of PLOS Currents. New developments in CRISPR technology, with a focus on mouse and human cell applications. Vaping while pregnant could cause craniofacial birth defects, VCU study shows published in the journal PLOS in late All the frog embryos exposed to one. The latest Tweets from PLOS (@PLOS). Here is our featured author question for July. com, Elsevier’s leading platform of peer-reviewed scholarly literature. We aim to provide tools for readers to filter and evaluate our publications. Read a recent update to this piece: PLOS ONE Output Drops Again In 2016. How do you get started as a new peer reviewer? Follow these 10 quick tips to jump-start your reviewing career. The threads at SV-POW! are hopping right now, particularly with one commenting on open access in Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. Program Rules. The journal also provides high-quality reviews and perspectives written by respected leaders in the. About Founded in 1986 with the belief that the most effective way to change behavior and adopt a healthier lifestyle is through face-to-face interaction infused with hospitality, empathy, and a lot of fun. Manuscript 30 Peer Review Procedures Overview: All manuscripts submitted to PLOS ONE are subject to rigorous review. 2017;12(7):e0181057 DOI 10. A peer-reviewed 'article' in [the flagship online publication] PLOS ONE, which is fixed, peer-reviewed openly via the PLOS Wiki and citable, giving information about that particular topic. com is Leading Issues in Business Research Methods Volume 2, a new book which features a selection of papers from the Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, with an introduction and chapter by chapter comments by EJBRM Associate Editors Susan Geringer and John Mendy. PLOS ONE (bis Mitte 2012 PLoS ONE) ist eine internationale Online-Fachzeitschrift der Public Library of Science (PLOS). It's helpful to divide this section into two parts: one for major issues and one for minor issues. The latest Tweets from PLOS (@PLOS). PLOS ONE accepts scientifically rigorous research, regardless of perceived impact. These templates typically mimic the layout of the articles published by the journal and allow the author to preview their written work in this final layout. We would like to submit it to PLOS ONE. Authors of most PLOS journals can now opt to post their manuscript as a preprint upon submission. PLOS ONE: an inclusive, peer-reviewed, open-access resource from the PUBLIC LIBRARY OF SCIENCE. In 2017, PLOS Genetics joined the initiative, as detailed in a blog post. The focus on technical validity rather than article impact at PLOS One likely contributes to quicker review and revision periods. The fact-checkers, whose work is more and more important for those who prefer facts over lies, police the line between fact and falsehood on a day-to-day basis, and do a great job. Today, my small contribution is to pass along a very good overview that reflects on one of Trump’s favorite overarching falsehoods. Namely: Trump describes an America in which everything was going down the tubes under  Obama, which is why we needed Trump to make America great again. And he claims that this project has come to fruition, with America setting records for prosperity under his leadership and guidance. “Obama bad; Trump good” is pretty much his analysis in all areas and measurement of U.S. activity, especially economically. Even if this were true, it would reflect poorly on Trump’s character, but it has the added problem of being false, a big lie made up of many small ones. Personally, I don’t assume that all economic measurements directly reflect the leadership of whoever occupies the Oval Office, nor am I smart enough to figure out what causes what in the economy. But the idea that presidents get the credit or the blame for the economy during their tenure is a political fact of life. Trump, in his adorable, immodest mendacity, not only claims credit for everything good that happens in the economy, but tells people, literally and specifically, that they have to vote for him even if they hate him, because without his guidance, their 401(k) accounts “will go down the tubes.” That would be offensive even if it were true, but it is utterly false. The stock market has been on a 10-year run of steady gains that began in 2009, the year Barack Obama was inaugurated. But why would anyone care about that? It’s only an unarguable, stubborn fact. Still, speaking of facts, there are so many measurements and indicators of how the economy is doing, that those not committed to an honest investigation can find evidence for whatever they want to believe. Trump and his most committed followers want to believe that everything was terrible under Barack Obama and great under Trump. That’s baloney. Anyone who believes that believes something false. And a series of charts and graphs published Monday in the Washington Post and explained by Economics Correspondent Heather Long provides the data that tells the tale. The details are complicated. Click through to the link above and you’ll learn much. But the overview is pretty simply this: The U.S. economy had a major meltdown in the last year of the George W. Bush presidency. Again, I’m not smart enough to know how much of this was Bush’s “fault.” But he had been in office for six years when the trouble started. So, if it’s ever reasonable to hold a president accountable for the performance of the economy, the timeline is bad for Bush. GDP growth went negative. Job growth fell sharply and then went negative. Median household income shrank. The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped by more than 5,000 points! U.S. manufacturing output plunged, as did average home values, as did average hourly wages, as did measures of consumer confidence and most other indicators of economic health. (Backup for that is contained in the Post piece I linked to above.) Barack Obama inherited that mess of falling numbers, which continued during his first year in office, 2009, as he put in place policies designed to turn it around. By 2010, Obama’s second year, pretty much all of the negative numbers had turned positive. By the time Obama was up for reelection in 2012, all of them were headed in the right direction, which is certainly among the reasons voters gave him a second term by a solid (not landslide) margin. Basically, all of those good numbers continued throughout the second Obama term. The U.S. GDP, probably the single best measure of how the economy is doing, grew by 2.9 percent in 2015, which was Obama’s seventh year in office and was the best GDP growth number since before the crash of the late Bush years. GDP growth slowed to 1.6 percent in 2016, which may have been among the indicators that supported Trump’s campaign-year argument that everything was going to hell and only he could fix it. During the first year of Trump, GDP growth grew to 2.4 percent, which is decent but not great and anyway, a reasonable person would acknowledge that — to the degree that economic performance is to the credit or blame of the president — the performance in the first year of a new president is a mixture of the old and new policies. In Trump’s second year, 2018, the GDP grew 2.9 percent, equaling Obama’s best year, and so far in 2019, the growth rate has fallen to 2.1 percent, a mediocre number and a decline for which Trump presumably accepts no responsibility and blames either Nancy Pelosi, Ilhan Omar or, if he can swing it, Barack Obama. I suppose it’s natural for a president to want to take credit for everything good that happens on his (or someday her) watch, but not the blame for anything bad. Trump is more blatant about this than most. If we judge by his bad but remarkably steady approval ratings (today, according to the average maintained by 538.com, it’s 41.9 approval/ 53.7 disapproval) the pretty-good economy is not winning him new supporters, nor is his constant exaggeration of his accomplishments costing him many old ones). I already offered it above, but the full Washington Post workup of these numbers, and commentary/explanation by economics correspondent Heather Long, are here. On a related matter, if you care about what used to be called fiscal conservatism, which is the belief that federal debt and deficit matter, here’s a New York Times analysis, based on Congressional Budget Office data, suggesting that the annual budget deficit (that’s the amount the government borrows every year reflecting that amount by which federal spending exceeds revenues) which fell steadily during the Obama years, from a peak of $1.4 trillion at the beginning of the Obama administration, to $585 billion in 2016 (Obama’s last year in office), will be back up to $960 billion this fiscal year, and back over $1 trillion in 2020. (Here’s the New York Times piece detailing those numbers.) Trump is currently floating various tax cuts for the rich and the poor that will presumably worsen those projections, if passed. As the Times piece reported: